An open discussion on what everyone is currently reading. Make recommendations to others, discuss what is new, hot, bestsellers, anything and everything related to books and the authors.

Views: 10135

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Adding MD to your name gives the readers a belief that you are qualified to write on a subject. I seldom use Ph.D. after my name but I have on occasion used CPL AUS DIS as a gag, the meaning being Corporal, Army of the United States (e.g. draftee) Discharged. I have a friend who had two Orders of the British Empire (OBE) but never adds them to her signature.
I would never use Ph.D. after my name, and I would never read a book by someone who has to bolster his credibility that way. For that matter, if this book is a mystery, how does the M.D. lend any qualifications?
I should add that the addition of degrees also disqualifies non-fiction since it generally signals that the book is an unscientific attempt to sell to the masses. In non-fiction you look at the publisher's blurb, and at the bibliography and the index in the back to make sure the author is qualified to discuss the topic.
Just starting Walla Walla Suite by Anne Argula (pen name). I liked Krapp's Last Cassette so much I nearly peed.
If you are writing a medical mystery or a book that requjires the author be qualified to write on the subject, the academic degree is appropriate. One sci-fi author was E.E. Smith, Ph.D. If an author is writing about Christianity, for example, would you question the authenticity if the author identified himself as a rabbi? Mormon?
It all depends if the book is written for the general public or for the research community. I don't buy non-fiction that isn't research. I don't need the author's titles, because I take those for granted. What I look for are those other markers that show the book to be serious-research-based.

Would a rabbi write a book about Christianity? My guess is if he did, the publisher would announce this in the blurbs. Is think any popular books written by Ph.D.s and M.D.s should be similarly introduced if it's relevant.
Besides, let's face it, a lot of those degrees are of dubious origin.
Not all non-fiction has extensive bibliographies, notes, and indices. These are necessary to readers who want to further their understanding of the subject. They also tend to be vetted by other authorities in the field. In other words, there are various levels of reliability and effort involved.
I'm reading DOG ON IT and enjoying it. What can I say. I'm a sucker for dogs.
Some people show off their degrees. It's an ego thing. Others are unimpressed by titles. Who cares if I have a BA?
I stopped by for a chat with Kate Shugak. THE SINGING OF THE DEAD and A FINE AND BITTER SNOW. Word is Dana Stabenow finally found someone willing to film the series in Alaska, so she has sold the movie rights. How anything could equal the books I don't know, but I won't miss watching them.

Watched "Frank Herbert's Children of Dune," so now I'm reading the books it was made from.
Just finished the winner of the Inaugural Text Prize for Young Adult and Children's Writing (unpublished manuscript) - The Billionaire's Curse by Richard Newsome. Billed as Indiana Jones meets the Famous Five, it had a rather quaint, sort of good old fashioned kids story feel to it - reminded me very much of the sorts of books that got me hooked as a kid. Last night I started Stone's Fall by Iain Pears which is a thumping big 596 page doorstopper of a thing!
nearly finished Faceless Killers by Henning Mankell. It's very different from the usual crime fiction I've read in the past. It's actually pretty good. :)
Mankell is my favorite of the Swedish writers. Faceless Killers is the first of 10 or 11 in the series. Do read them in order of publication.

In a break from my usual reading diet of mysteries, I'm reading Craig Ferguson's autobiography. Love that man!


CrimeSpace Google Search

© 2023   Created by Daniel Hatadi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service