This is meant to be a fun post, I hope. :)  But with a somewhat serious intent---keep reading.  During some other discussions, I.J. Parker and I both concurred that we really did not like Lady Helen Clyde, the wife of DI Thomas Lynley, who got bumped off by Elizabeth George in "With No One As Witness."   A shocking demise,  especially since Lady H was pregnant, but it served to remove a character who had come to seem....well, superfluous, as well as downright aggravating.   Her husband and friends all adored Lady Helen, but to me she seemed for the most part a frivolous, vacuous, spoiled woman whose main interest in life was shopping.

 Whether or not this vapidity was an act, it did grate on some readers' nerves. Deliberately?  I had to wonder how long George had it in mind to take Lady Helen out. From the start, or later on when she no longer had an interest in developing the character.

Then I thought of another character who has also gotten my nerves no end: Spencer's girlfriend Susan Silverman in   Robert Parker's  series.  A woman who showers before sex, in case she might seem human, and eats like a damn bird.  You can be sure she never drops a piece on food on her immaculate clothing, or burps or....anything. How in the world did a guy like Spencer come to be besotted with a princess like Susan Silverman?  Is this a joke? 
Or does she serve some other purpose? (To give class to Spencer, the way Fred Astaire was meant to give class to Ginger Rogers?)

Someone else mentioned being annoyed by Holmes' Watson, although without him,  as Jon Loomis has pointed out, how would we ever know Sherlock Holmes at all?  So irritating or not, he's essential.

So. now I would like to invite all who are interested  to name their "favorite annoying character" (or characters)  in a murder mystery/detective novel.  It can be the detective, of course,  or a partner/sidekick, or a wife/girlfriend/boyfriend---someone who regularly appears in a series. Tell who, tell why. :)  That's the fun part.

 Because my other  "serious" question is (and as writers you can perhaps shed some light on  this one)---is the creation of really annoying characters intentional on a writers' part?  I don't mean just the characters who annoy the detective---but characters who are liable to rub readers the wrong way, to raise hackles, even when they are liked by the detective? 

Naturally someone is always getting the detective's' goat---that's par for the course, it seems, in every detectove  novel, usually a superior officer, or some nosy journalist  whom nobody can stand.  I'm talking about characters that you as a reader would perhaps like to throttle--- a character you've got to put up with.  :)
 

Views: 373

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I find her very self-congratulatory.

She was a great cook, though! :)
The self-congratulatory trait is probably one of the dangers of first person narrative. Cornwell wants to present this independent, confident, no-nonsense woman, and that's how she does it. In one of her later books, Cornwell switches to third person, and it doesn't work very well. You get used to Kay's voice, to her confident if occasionally overweening personality! Men seem to be her one weakness....
I really disliked Scarpetta's niece Lucy (Patricia Cornwell), whenever she was in a chapter I felt irritated

I couldn't stand her either! Lucy was OK as a little kid; it's when she grew up that she morphed into something obnoxious. But then, so did Pete Marino. He was a great sidekick for Scarpetta in the early books---kind of like Havers was to Lynley. Seems as though Cornwell didn't know what to do with his character later on, it seems---didn't know where to go with the "crush" thing. So she went too far.
there are a lot of reasons i stopped reading cornwall and the development of marino's character was one of them. he just became an out and out a-hole.
he just became an out and out a-hole.

Of course, can you blame him....:) Here he's had a crush on Scarpetta for years and years, and who does she pick? Benton Wesley, Mr. Perfect! Another character I could have done without. It wasn't that he was especially irritating.....just too good to be true. It seems that novelists can create physically flawed by believable "minor" characters, but when it comes to hero/heroine, they have to be good-looking and sexy. :(

RSS

CrimeSpace Google Search

© 2019   Created by Daniel Hatadi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service