The month of August should have brought the rewards for many months of writing and revising (not to mention other hassles and expenses associated with getting a book into print). It should have been a month of gathering reviews, the fruits of my labors. I love reviews, all of them.
But there weren’t any.
Perhaps I exaggerate a little. I’m horribly disappointed because I consider THE CONVICT’S SWORD my best book. If any book of mine will ever make an impression, I thought, this is the one. Well, apart from a starred PW review, it fell dreadfully flat -- both in print and electronically.
Not only that, one reader, a gentleman in the UK, sent me an agitated e-mail, protesting against this “joyless” “soap opera” of a book when he was so solidly hooked on all the other Akitada novels.
So, what happened? I suspect the reason for the general silence is at least partially that THE CONVICT’S SWORD is a very dark novel. It deals with loss and the fall-out on the survivors. The whole novel, in one way or another, traces the pain that is part of being human. My protagonist deals with this in his own life even as he tries to ease the suffering of others caught in a terrible miscarriage of justice.
I tried to deal honestly with psychological flaws in Akitada and his wife, and discovered that readers like their heroes to be perfect. I tried to show how harsh life could be in those days, and found that readers like to visit a past that is filled with color and derring-do, where all hardships are temporary, and all adventures end happily.
Perhaps the idea of escape into a better time is why many genre novels succeed when literary novels fail dismally in the sales department. You have to give people what they want, and that is rarely reality.
Or at least you need someone to tell them why they should read the book anyway.
You need to be a member of CrimeSpace to add comments!