I love to read two kinds of novels- crime thrillers, supernatural tales and espionage thrillers. But my favorite amongst these three are crime thrillers.Why? Not only because we have some of the best writers in these two categories- Agatha Christie, Sherlock Holmes, James Patterson, Val McDermid, Stieg Larsson, Robert Ludlum, Michael Connolly, Thomas Harris....the list goes on.
But because the main attraction is the darkness in human beings explored in these gritty thrillers. And what better manifestation of those darkness except in the most violent,brutal, shockingly wanton crimes? Having just finished writing my very first crime novel, I realize that violence is an integral part of a crime thriller. Admit it or not, but gritty, bone-chilling murders make up for a perfect crime novel. I found myself, although subconsciously, put a lot of violence in my murder scenes.
But the question here is...how much of blood and gore should a crime novel have? Is there a limit? Or crime novelists can just go on and on until they create a blood-and-guts fest?
Some novels which I found excessively violent were Thomas Harris' Hannibal trilogy, Val McDermid's the Mermaid's Singing, and Steig Larsson's Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Not that it affected me, a self-styled 'seasoned' reader of 'grisly' crime thrillers. But me putting up a brave front apart, how violent should crime thrillers be? How much should crime writers indulge themselves? And how much should we, as readers, allow them to?
You need to be a member of CrimeSpace to add comments!