A great plot written poorly will sell faster than a poor plot written greatly.

Thoughts?

Views: 33

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think that's probably true, but not with me. I can forgive a lot in the plot if the writing captures me.
If the writing does not get me involved, I have quit long before any plot has been revealed. I am one of those evil people who can and do drop a book in the first chapter. No guilt and no apologies because my reading time matters to me.
I think if there's any one determining factor, it's hype. The Da Vinci Code has an interesting plot, but without hype, I think it would have passed under the radar along with most everything else.
Whose hype do you mean, John? Publishers hype a lot of things but only a minority take off.
I'm jut saying that I think hype generally will sell a book faster than its inherent qualities. I don't think there's any way to determine which will sell faster between the choices Jude gave. But I'm not in marketing either, so.
Actually, now that I think about it, I buy books based on the plot more than sampling the writing. But that's just me. So, yeah, I guess I'll have to agree with Jude.
That's the way it SHOULD be, IMHO. We're storytellers.
Agreed assuming we're talking mystery/suspense genre. I can think of many great plot/poor writing best sellers, but not so many best sellers with poor plots and great writing.

One certainly doesn't read Raymond Chandler for the plots.

Actually the crime novels published today usually have decent plots, it seems to me. It's the quality of writing with the large variance.
I agree about Chandler's plots -- in THE BIG SLEEP, one murder is never explained at all -- but I think he was one heck of a storyteller, meaning he had the reader (me, anyway) gripped. I had to keep turning pages, had to find out what happened to Marlowe next. I believe this is the essential need of all storytelling, from the first campfire to today's bestsellers, although of course there are many exceptions. Fame, platform, and previous good works bring all sorts of novels to the bestseller list.
Fame, platform, previous good works -- and, like John D. said -- hype, too, can make a book reach the bestseller lists.
I am afraid you are right! - which is so unfair :(

And I must admit that I read some crime novels which are poorly written if the plot is catching but I would never review it as positively as the well written books and I rarely buy books of this category.
Perhaps because I write, I'm notoriously impatient with poor writing. I also notice that frequently I seem to be the only one. Just tossed Michael Grigorio's CRITIQUE OF CRIMINAL REASON for poor writing (and careless historical background). I seem to remember getting the book (in the library, fortunately) because it was extravagantly praised somewhere (someone's best of 2008 ?). The book is the author's first and very badly overwritten stylistically. He is a philosophy professor, so I expect thematically (the serial killer thriller turns on Kant's philosophy) is probably fine. The plot may also be okay. I just didn't get far enough in to find out. (Have no time to waste on bad books)

RSS

CrimeSpace Google Search

© 2020   Created by Daniel Hatadi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service