CrimeSpace

It seems like there are a lot of great private eye novels being published these days but there aren't very many private eyes on TV.

Or am I just not finding them?

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I was under the impression that Private Eyes were becoming unfashionable. PWA seems to have broadened their definition to get more books to qualify.

Reply to This

I think PWA's definition of private eye has been broad for a number of years now ... And were when I bacme a member in the late 1990s.

Reply to This

I'm not finding them either, on TV or at the movies.

Reply to This

Everything seems to be cops, forensics folks, and federal agents these days.

I don't think Anthony Pellicano helped provide any role models for Hollywood to use.

Reply to This

A short-lived series I quite liked was Eyes, which I thought was a pretty good modern take of the PI series. Other than that, it's just Veronica Mars as far as I can tell.

I think the PI style shows have been replaced by the amateur detective assisting the police or other enforcement department. I'm specifically thinking of The Mentalist, Chuck, and Castle. All of which I'm happy to enjoy as guilty pleasures. Mostly because the mysteries are okay, but the dialogue and characters are just plain fun (or really, really good looking).

Reply to This

I admit to loving 'Castle.' I've always liked Nathan Fillion, and he's particularly good in this, I think. His female foil is also good -- tough and smart without being a cardboard cut-out. The only thing I've found not to like about it is that one of the supporting characters, the Latino cop, talks like he's got a mouthful of marbles. What ever happened to teaching actors to enunciate? I have to watch it with the captions on. I figure it's got maybe another season before it's canceled. That's what usually happens to shows I like :-(

Reply to This

I miss my Magnum, P.I. Or T.H.E. Cat--- Or Peter Gunn.

Reply to This

I miss Magnum too! :(

Reply to This

I miss The Rockford Files!

Reply to This

I read somewhere that people are less likely to be drawn to PI stories--written or televised--in socially conservative times, such as the Red Scare of the 1950s or the post-9/11 period. Fictional PIs are, by convention, outsiders, who work around the system instead of in it. In eras of enfoeced conformity such as this, these traits are not attractive to as many people as they might be when the social attitude is somewhat looser. Mickey Spillane created a more or less personal resurgence of PI ficiton in the late 402 and early 50s, but the Mike Hammer stories are heavy of Right and Wrong and retribution, as opposed to shades of gray PI stories do so well. There are exceptions, of course (Lew Archer ran through the 50s in good shape), but the idea accounts for high and low periods in PI fiction.

That's a cyclical thing, so I expect they'll be back.

Reply to This

Interesting, Dana!

Reply to This

Yes, I'm also intrigued by this. I had assumed that the genre died because we were running into endless cliches about the down-at-heels P.I. in his down-at-heels office when this stunning blonde walks in and all hell breaks loose.
Since I have the highest respect for PWA and its Shamus award, I'm currently working hard to turn my guy into a P.I. long enough to be eligible. My protagonist is frequently wrongly classified as amateur sleuth. Since he is a member of the Justice Ministry, he is certainly no amateur. I tend to look at my books as related to police procedurals.
Since PWA has broadened the definition to include, for example, lawyers who do their own investigations, I would think Mick Haller, Connelly's protagonist, would probably represent the hope of future P.I. greats.

Reply to This

RSS

About

Daniel Hatadi Daniel Hatadi created this Ning Network.

© 2009   Created by Daniel Hatadi on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!