My ex-wife, who is now my very good friend, once called me a "Magnificent Hack." By that, I assumed that she was either damning me with feint praise of praising me to damnation.
After all these years, I finally agree with her. A hack I am, it seems, and I suppose a hack I will remain--unless my latest book, which has taken me almost a year to write does something big. (I usually finish a first and sometimes final draft in little more than a month. I have finished books that I sold in less than a week.)
My first ego booster came over 30 years ago when I was in college when my "Advanced Creative Writing" instructor said of our first efforts--and I have to paraphrase from memory. "A number of these pieces were good, but one ..." He shook his head and clicked his tongue, then read my first effort "Sunday on the Rhine" which became the springboard for my first Atlantic Monthly submission.
I'll share something here which I am sure many writers have experienced. (It's happened to me twice, once recently.) I was rejected, of course, what first efforts aren't? But the last line of the rejection, which they must have been using forever and probably still are, was, "You write with a facility that has held our attention." That's the kind of thing that kept me going until I sold my first book to an editor who said, "I like the book, but a need a cleaner manuscript." (Take heed new writers.)
Sometimes today, I will look at a line or a paragraph or a story or even an entire novel and think, "This is crap," or "This is terrific." There's never an in between. Ironically, I'll often think the same thing at different times about the same line, paragraph, etc.
Since this is a confession, I'll stop here and tell you that I've taken time out of my best writing day of the week, Saturday, to procrastinate again at the ending of my "Big Book," that one that I've been writing for almost a year.
Oh, yeah, about that hack thing: For while, I was publishing one piece of crap after another, and selling most of what I sent out. Unfortunately, for me, what I think is my best stuff never gets published, or hasn't so far.
The book I'm working on has been through several cycles in twenty years. Once, I even an agent even called me out of the shower on Sunday morning to tell me I had a bestseller on my hands--two weeks later, he decided not to handle it.
In a mid-90s reincarnation of the same book, an agent agreed to handle it. She sent out what I had sent her, the book minus 100 pages in the middle. She claimed she liked it. She seemed never to notice that it had continuity problems.
I've been nominated for The Shamus for my Paperback Original "Shadow of the Dahlia," and for both the Shamus and Anthony for my short story, "Munchies."
So far, they are my greatest claim to fame under my own name. I've even earned good reviews for my crap, almost all of which I wrote under names I'll never tell you about.
So much for procrastination.
As my escaped African Gray parrot used to say, "Time to Go to Work."
Jack Bludis, 3-24-07
P.S. I currently have a story "Blondes, Blondes, Blondes," at ThrillingDetective.com -- it's free to you, and I did get paid for it.
Posted on August 1, 2007 at 6:49am — 5 Comments
Two of the last three books that I have read "The Road" and "No Country for Old Men." And they are probably THE two best books I have read in the last twenty years.
The style is unique, but well planned. The text conversational complete with some phonetic spelling, regionalisms,
… ContinuePosted on May 25, 2007 at 11:00pm — 19 Comments
© 2009 Created by Daniel Hatadi on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
Comment Wall (346 comments)
You need to be a member of CrimeSpace to add comments!
Join this Ning Network
Vicki
I always forget to look at this site! It's me. Sorry to answer nearly a year late!
Vicki
I think that instead of "trash," I might have said "hack work." about 300 of my 400 stories were written first draft and barely proofread and most were in the category of erotica ... no so sure it was hard core because I was complimented by editors again and again for the characterization, the structure, etc. Some of what I wrote I am still being paid for on a quarterly basis.
Three novellas that I wrote sold 3 different times each (These were pulp-like mysteries that seem to hit a note with more than one editor.) Currently, it is sitting in the computer awaiting a decision by me whether to just let them die of rust or try to market them again.
They are the kind of pulp that we used to read in the army and mark the "interesting" paragraphs.
Every novel or story the bears the "Jack Bludis" name is a novel or story I am proud to show.
Of the the other 100+ Some are pretty good, some not so good. And a few ... hell, even I don't get the point.
Thanks for asking.
Roger Corman's is Academy Award when related to most of my many pseudonyms.
Thanks for asking. If you don't mind, I'm going to put this note on my own page as well as yours.
Maybe we can get a discussion going on the forum related to what is and is not trash when it comes to mysteries.
What it comes down to is that in no year did I ever make even a fraction of my annual income writing, but hope springs eternal. I might even get back to my opus one of these days.
Jack
Since so many consider the kinds of movies that Roger Corman makes as “trash,” I’ve been forced to consider the term myself (and the term “guilty pleasure”). I’m positive that your stories (and my screenplays) took a considerable amount of skill to write. I’m also sure that quite a few people have enjoyed those stories. So what makes them trash as apposed to an acclaimed novel or an award nominated story?
View All Comments