That's a quote (and literary allusion to the opening of Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, I think) from Robert Harris's "The Ghost." His protagonist, a ghost writer, goes on to say that the way in which all bad books are exactly the same is: "they don't ring true. I'm not saying that a good book is true necessarily, just that it feels true for the time you're reading it." What do you think?
FYI, I am really enjoying this political thriller. It's such a treat to discover a new suspense fiction author with sharp prose skills.
Tags:
I think it's only women. Mind you, it's a pleasurable shudder: the rape fantasy.
Men may respond to two aspects: the threat to their virginal females and the challenge to slay the evil monster. With Dracula, there are religious motifs also. He is the devil and the walking dead all in one.
But both Frankenstein's monster and Dracula have invaded the real world. That makes it a great deal harder to suspend disbelief, especially when asked to accept some rather weird and silly details.
Men may respond to two aspects: the threat to their virginal females and the challenge to slay the evil monster.
That's why this was a 19th century thing. There are almost no virginal females left. As for rape fantasy.... (in other words being overpowered) hm. In the 19th century....I wonder how often rape occurred in the marital bed?
Heck, I can suspend disbelief at a moment's notice! :) As for " monsters " invading the so-called real world....do you doubt it? I don't. Or is it they don't invade---they have always been here; they just become manifest at certain times. Now, that makes me shudder!
Ah, but I'm a rationalist. It gives me all sorts of trouble with old Japanese materials, because they were anything but.
In real life I'm a "rationalist" too--- mostly, I guess, but there's some "wiggle" room when it comes to fiction. No, I don't believe in ghosts, but I can entertain the possiblity of a person being haunted, of ghosts being real to some people, and not just dreamers.
People with certain kinds of mental or neurological disorders are said to see imaginary personages and hear voices that they believe are real . How this occurs I don't know---currently no one seems able to explain it, and we are inclined not to believe what we can't explain rationally, or what we ourselves don't experience. So, no, I don't believe in ghosts---but if one ever pays me a visit, I'll change my opinion. :) And maybe ask it, "What are you made of, anyway?"
Even though I've never experienced this (in waking life anyway), I don't deny it. A lot of people really want to believe in the supernatural (like Fox Mulder of X-Files---"I Want to Believe" )--- it opens up a whole other dimension of possiblities---the possibility of life after death, of transcending death.
For a rationalist you handle that well in your novels. Maybe I don't believe in ghosts not because they aren't real but because I've never had that experience. But I could always ask, "What if...." Because in fact, I don't KNOW for sure that the believers aren't right.
There is always the reality of another person's perception. One can stipulate that. In fact, where would psychologists be if they didn't take their patients seriously. I suppose writers are in a similar situation.
But how many movies have been made from Shelley's or Byron's work? Zip! Mary hit a deep psychological part of the mind, the fear of the unknown. Fear of the strange and of ourselves. The monster as a symbol for each of us and the monsters we harbor inside. I think that's a pretty good one.
How many sequels have there been to Ozymandias?
How many sequels to Frankenstein? Here is the list. It proves that Mary's story touched many people.
Since a complete list of films based directly or indirectly on Frankenstein would run into the thousands, it's convenient to exclude films with only a tangential relationship to the original novel: those, for instance, with only a mad scientist, a raising-from-the-dead theme, or a Creature cameo. This chronological list includes most of the major feature films between 1910 and 1994 based on Shelley's novel.
To be fair:
It doesn't need a sequel. Ozymandias, he gone.
Maybe a prequel? :) Hollywood would.
Jesus! That list is so long it's an irritation. I don't know what point you're making. Films do not prove quality. Mass appeal does not prove quality. Fear of the Unknown starts in early childhood with imaginary things under the bed. A large number of people clearly enjoy reliving their childhood. Is it an enriching experience? Does one learn something from it? I don't think so. You may, of course, stipulate that Mary all along wished to give us a warning about the dangers inherent in pursuing scientific research. Frankly, facts about her life don't bear that out.
Mostly she was making fun of her husband, and playing around with the romantics' idea of the sublime, which didn't mean then what we think it means now.
I hope to God my books are not enriching. I hope also that they're not didactic in any way. Not sure what anyone would learn from them, except maybe that GLBT people are people. I suppose that might comes as a surprise to some Americans, still. God help us.
LOL.
Welcome to
CrimeSpace
© 2024 Created by Daniel Hatadi. Powered by